tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-57198975284327285.post6686417591667473353..comments2022-08-04T07:46:37.428-04:00Comments on Fugitive Vision: Defining DefinitionsEvan Mirapaulhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12081536503577305620noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-57198975284327285.post-43586819079931178662009-03-13T10:36:00.000-04:002009-03-13T10:36:00.000-04:00Perhaps even more than 5, Tommi. That was my chall...Perhaps even more than 5, Tommi. That was my challenge with the "3 way slice" definition. A creative person could do that with just one work. If you have one work, are you a collector? Maybe yes, maybe no. I agree that inclusion is more healthy and productive, though we do get some good discussions out of the seeing the differences. I'm all for trenchant debates around the differences as long as it doesn't lead to the exclusion you mention.Evan Mirapaulhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12081536503577305620noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-57198975284327285.post-92088229963779090442009-03-13T07:41:00.000-04:002009-03-13T07:41:00.000-04:00Hey Evan, great post and I can remember your baffl...Hey Evan, great post and I can remember your baffled facial expression when this "three-way" definition of "collector" first came up.<BR/><BR/>What I find interesting in this sort of discussion is that we tend to focus on what the actual difference is between different understandings or definitions of terms, instead of exploring what they might have in common. <BR/><BR/>True: We can only perceive difference (that's why camouflage works, right?) but to dwell on these differences almost always leads to judgement and exclusion. Im more interested in inclusion.<BR/><BR/>Coming back to the "collector": The good thing/problem is that if you would ask 3 different curators to create an exhibition of any collection, you will probably end up with 5 different curatorial lines.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com